Interesting.
I'd planned to inspect Donna's posts more closely today, but that won't be necessary, I suppose. Means we're doing to one carnival worker, allegedly Kiersten.
But right now it's time for
Analysing Claire's Posts!!!
Day One:
(though I agree it seems a bit mean, which does also make me think there's at least one inexperienced wolf who might not have realised it was Lexi's first game)
This could have been a misdirect, if the other wolf was an experienced player.
And I'll be watchin people who are lurking and not posting
I am going to withhold for now as well, but I'll probably cast a vote randomly for one of the quieter players this time around, purely because anyone who's not contributing to the discussion now will give us nothing to go on later when it becomes really critical to hit a wolf
Ditto for these lines, if both wolves are actively participating in the conversation.
(At the points she said that I believe the people who hadn't posted were Daph, Mia, Kadi, Sophia, Annabelle, Samantha, and Emzies. The people who had were me, Ana, Ruben, Kiersten and Donna. It could also easily have been a warning to the other wolf to post before she voted, which of the surviving players would point to Kiersten, Sophia, Samantha, or Kadi, who all posted shortly after.)
Ruben's vote for Annabelle at the time made it 3 : 2 (Mia : Annabelle), which I feel would be a super risky wolf move - maybe if Mia had had 5 votes already and he threw one in for Annabelle, I'd be more sus, but there was still a risk of us changing our mind and voting for Annabelle instead at that point
Jumping in pretty quickly to defend Ruben with incorrect information. Could have been a genuine mistake, could have been an attempt to mislead us in the hopes nobody was backreading.
Anyway, I'm going to vote for Selene Le Fey, just to make a tie less likely. Sorry Mia if you're innocent
She was the final person to vote for Mia, throwing her hat in the ring last minute likely in an attempt to seem less suspicious by joining the bandwagon to avoid a tie.
Also notable that
Kiersten was the only person to vote for Claire day one.
Day Two:
On day two, Claire was the one who started the whole Strongman debate, which is interesting to me. I really don't know if it was a wolf attempt to prime us for a possible future tactic, or just throwing out random information in the hopes of getting us talking about anything other than the previous day's votes, after I had said I found her vote suspicious.
But then, if I were a wolf, surely I'd have just said nothing and carried out my plan if/when I got targeted? Why would I bring it up for discussion first and have someone potentially point out the danger in it? Wouldn't it be way way more effective to just do it?!
My tactic in these games has always just been to raise points of discussion (and sometimes ruffle feathers) to see how people respond, which is risky, but no conversation means no evidence, so I'm willing to take that risk even if it means I get targeted.
IDK how true to think this is, I think it would be silly to assume
everything Claire said was part of some Rube-Goldberg machine of lies hinting lies hinting lies, but at the same time I think it would be silly not to assume everything she said had the
potential of concealing something important.
The people who voted
for Claire on Day Two were
1) Me (Later changed to Poppy Perkins)
2) Samantha
So I'm going to vote for Ainsley Lynch for now
Claire again voting for an innocent player,
interestingly going for me despite the fact that Ana had votes against her at this point, and Claire could have swung things in Ana's direction. She later changed to
So for the reasons above I'm going to change my vote from Rowan to Amy Jewel... despite the fact it's probably too late to make a difference
Kicking off that bandwagon, when at the time Annabelle had no votes against her at all, but again Ana had one. Why switch to a random player when it would be much easier to pull the bandwagon over to Ana?
Because we're still statistically unlikely to hit a wolf through random voting this early on, I tend to vote for someone whose death will give the most context to other people's behaviour whether they turn out to be a wolf or a villager.
I think this is true, but it's worth keeping in mind.
Day Three:
The main thing I have to say about her behaviour day three is how
strange it is that she didn't pull us to a tie. She could have thrown a vote to Emzies, wasted a day of village time on the Sword Swallower, and forced us to try and vote her off the
next day instead.
My
wild theory for this is that Kadi isn't the Sword Swallower, and is in fact a fellow wolf Claire didn't want to risk unmasking. I think it's
extremely unlikely, as this ruse would only work if
Emzies is the real Sword Swallower. That said, I don't think it's entirely impossible. Kadi could have seen the Sword Swallower was in danger and not making a case for themselves, and jumped in to fill that spot easily.
The people who voted
for Claire day 3 were
1) Me
2) Ana
3) Ruben
4) Kadi
Kadi only jumped in to break the tie, behaviour that both makes sense if she's Sword Swallower or a wolf hiding under that mantle.
Analysing these posts brought up a lot of interesting thoughts for me, though not necessarily anything useful. I still find Sophia's vote yesterday
extremely suspicious, and looking back at Claire's posts and votes has raised eyebrows for me about Ana and Kadi, though nothing conclusive, and in Kadi's case I think it's a huge reach.