🌕 Halloween Werewolf 🐺

Elliot Briar said:
This is werewolf, the only people who have the luxery of being nice are people who know they won't get eaten. Like say, a wolf :r

EDIT: Ana and me on the same wavelength here 🧠
Click to expand...
I had no idea people were so ruthless here!=))pardon my sympathy =))
 
Oh wow, I missed the last few pages and all votes are on me, I'm sure I definitely look sus and especially for appearing in this moment considering the votes, but the truth tea is that I have been mostly not been posting from busy IRL with many things and the few short times I have been online are not during the day phase so I haven't been able to comment on this game, but I am paying attention definitely following along I promise 👀

Ana commented earlier that it would make sense for one of the wolves to be leading the conversation, and I also believe that, and I also am confident that the wolves would be aware of previous games in some context considering Jesse wasn't killed straight away, and would know the 'standard' of voting out inactive people, and are possibly relying on that as they post in the day phase not to draw suspicion to themselves.

The inactivity thing can be a double edged sword I think, it could be a matter of wolves trying to lay low and fly under the radar, and voting out people who aren't contributing makes absolute sense as well. But the people that aren't posting as often might have night roles that do help the village and don't want to be caught out. The seer and fool are an example of that, and it would make sense to me if those roles aren't as actively posting in the game as others until they figure out their role and can actually be of use.

I also wouldn't be surprised at all if the wolves are aware of this, and are trying to bait quiet players that are on the side of the village and have important roles like the seer or fool, into posting early so they can vote to lynch them and/or hunt them down and further their cause.

I also also wouldn't be surprised if the reason Jesse wasn't killed off (if he isn't a wolf) on the first day is so the wolves can bring him into the conversation as suspicious later.

But in saying all of this I love that two of the wolves are gone now and their numbers are halved.

For the sake of possibly being helpful to the village while I can, and knowing that if I do reveal my role I will probably be killed regardless, I am either the seer or fool, and I did see Elliot Briar as the Dire wolf last night. I wanted to wait until I had anything of use to post and figure it out, but this is all I've got. I might be the seer or the fool but use that information however you will.

Not really sure what else to add, but these are my thoughts I am on the side of the village.

Edit: also as an additional point of bringing in voting patterns, Elliot Briar was the first to vote in this game I believe and the first to suggest lynching people. If this is wrong excuse me but in my notes on my phone I have that written down :p But if I am the fool all that information is useless.

Edit #2: Oh crapola I didn't vote myself, but I am gonna vote for Elliot Briar for what it's worth! Gonna look like a mad fool if I'm wrong =))
 
Last edited:
Well that's an....interesting take. I don't think its unlikely a wolf is leading the conversation but I have no reason to believe Kiersten's info isn't good so my vote isn't changing.

Also I'm not sure why you aren't being clear about your role since lynching seems inevitable at this point?? Unless you are a wolf and want to confuse us.

And the Fool rule says "the Fool unfortunately receives only random answers" so that means what info the Fool gets can be wrong, correct?? @Ainsley Lynch
 
Poppy Perkins said:
Well that's an....interesting take. I don't think its unlikely a wolf is leading the conversation but I have no reason to believe Kiersten's info isn't good so my vote isn't changing.

Also I'm not sure why you aren't being clear about your role since lynching seems inevitable at this point?? Unless you are a wolf and want to confuse us.

And the Fool rule says "the Fool unfortunately receives only random answers" so that means what info the Fool gets can be wrong, correct?? @Ainsley Lynch
Click to expand...
I can't be specific about my role, because I do not know if I am the seer or the fool. What I am saying is I could be either of them, and it is too early to tell and I don't know if the information I have is correct, but this is the information I do have, to help the village how I can as the votes are not in my favour.

Edit: I am revealing the information I have because the lynching is inevitable and again, I want to help while I can. I wanted to wait until I knew whether I was the seer or the fool before revealing anything.
 
If you're one of the seers/fools, then Kiersten would be a wolf, which would only happen if the wolves agreed to eat one of their own on the first day. I guess that's technically possible, but it doesn't seem very smart or likely.
 
Well, either you're the fool or you're a canny wolf counting on confusing the real seer/fool into confusing their own role.

It is possible Kiersten received vague info an assumed Anna was a wolf from that, but I'm willing to trust her over that. Assuming I know my role and I've been pretty much cleared by a lot of the village as trustworthy, I'm willing to take a bet of wolf vs fool especially considering how suspicious Anna's sudden appearance is now. Ideally, with the Silversmith also being revealed, our real seer can be 100% certain of their role come tomorrow.
 
Also, this is assuming our seer (and potential actual fool) hasn't been paying enough attention to figure out their own role already, as I believe they should already know 100%. If they DON'T then they're really letting the village down and not paying nearly enough attention at this point.

If you are the fool, you're about as good as a villager to us, and a villager who hasn't said much to conversation yet.. so again, willing to trust Kiersten's info over yours.
 
Elliot Briar said:
Well, either you're the fool or you're a canny wolf counting on confusing the real seer/fool into confusing their own role.

It is possible Kiersten received vague info an assumed Anna was a wolf from that, but I'm willing to trust her over that. Assuming I know my role and I've been pretty much cleared by a lot of the village as trustworthy, I'm willing to take a bet of wolf vs fool especially considering how suspicious Anna's sudden appearance is now. Ideally, with the Silversmith also being revealed, our real seer can be 100% certain of their role come tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Yeah I do hope that if the other person that was told they were a seer is the actual seer they will be able to help from this point on.

oh and Edit: I keep forgetting to add things but, I love how you're focusing on the fact I am only posting now to make me seem suspicious, I do have an innocent role whether it's the fool or the seer and I am trying to give the info I do have while I can, to help whoever the other seer is figure out their role themselves.
 
I am sorry if you are a fool as any loss of a villager is a shame, but at this point I'm not convinced and the seer/fool is an excellent role to claim, since the real seer or fool can't (and shouldn't) out themselves at this point, and it is a great way to confuse them and the village.

Honestly, I do think Kiersten could have made a conclusion and be wrong, but I really think this was a very smart play from Anna as a wolf.
 
Elliot Briar said:
I am sorry if you are a fool as any loss of a villager is a shame, but at this point I'm not convinced and the seer/fool is an excellent role to claim, since the real seer or fool can't (and shouldn't) out themselves at this point, and it is a great way to confuse them and the village.
Click to expand...

Just as a note I am notoriously bad at werewolf and I would out myself early cause I have no idea what I'm doing 💃 me laying low was an attempt to play the game well and look how that's turned out x_x
 
ALSO one last thing but I will probably add more, if this conversation ends up useful you're welcome, if not, that's cool too. I'm sure it would seem like I'm a desperate wolf, but I'm really not 🤷‍♂️
 
I more meant that the other seer/fool cannot dispute your claim for fear of being eaten.
 
Elliot Briar said:
I more meant that the other seer/fool cannot dispute your claim for fear of being eaten.
Click to expand...
Anyway, what do you think of what I said about the wolves' tactics? Assuming you're better at this game than I am, regardless whether your role is innocent or not. :D
 
...I really do think there's a good chance Anna is a wolf, but Kris's comment about Kiersten jumping to conclusions is bothering me. Especially since Kiersten keeps on liking Anna's posts. And under that scenario (Anna is a seer/fool, Kiersten is a villager), there would still be two wolves left to find instead of just one and we wouldn't know for sure how close we are to winning.
 
What an interesting turn of events. Sorry Anna but this really does feel like a last ditch attempt to confuse people. Especially since you are just breaking your silence now, even though I know being busy is a very valid reason.

Who knows, maybe we will all be the fool and Kiersten is some kind of evil mastermind/wolf sleeper agent. Which also isn't likely since she could have lead us astray much earlier if she wanted to. Like why wait for day 3 to give us an actual person. Especially since we established the code for the ghost before she posted on day 2. But I agree Krersten is being VERY sus liking all those posts!! Whyyyyy??????
 
Samuel Phillips said:
Anyway, what do you think of what I said about the wolves' tactics?
Click to expand...
You mean about.. wolves baiting quiet players into revealing themselves? I honestly think some players have been pretty cavalier about their roles already and it's helped me a tonne, but I think a silent player, even one with a special role, doesn't help us much in finding the wolves, and we already moved away from inactive players being lynched at this stage since we were started to have more concrete info to go on.

Plus, I've not seen any behavior from anyone, aside from myself, for pushing folks into voting/voicing an opinion really. So, not sure what you're getting at here. Werewolf is a teamgame, so it's always in your best interests to reveal as much info as you can without getting yourself killed.

Also, if anyone's curious, I have played werewolf a grand total of Once.
 
I mean tea 🍵 is I have accepted the lynching. I do want the village to win and I am trying to help. I do understand how it would be sus and seem like a last ditch effort, but telling me it seems too good to be true must mean it is too good to be true, no?

Also note in previous games I have not been near as straight forward. For whatever that means.
 
Elliot Briar said:
You mean about.. wolves baiting quiet players into revealing themselves? I honestly think some players have been pretty cavalier about their roles already and it's helped me a tonne, but I think a silent player, even one with a special role, doesn't help us much in finding the wolves, and we already moved away from inactive players being lynched at this stage since we were started to have more concrete info to go on.

Plus, I've not seen any behavior from anyone, aside from myself, for pushing folks into voting/voicing an opinion really. So, not sure what you're getting at here. Werewolf is a teamgame, so it's always in your best interests to reveal as much info as you can without getting yourself killed.

Also, if anyone's curious, I have played werewolf a grand total of Once.
Click to expand...

Edit because I posted accidentally: I mean what is your opinion of everything. Of not killing Jesse the first night, of focusing on inactive players instead of active ones, is it a double edged sword? what about of wolves possibly posting actively, to make those not actively posting seem suspicious. I would be as useless as a fool who posted, as one that didn't post if I do end up being the fool. I just don't know if I am either and wanted to know whether I was before doing anything. I have been the actual seer in the past and I never want to post unless I believe I have something to add, and I have been busy. I do want to help and really now that I am posting while I can I may as well. I don't really have anything to lose.
 
Re: Kiersten, I keep mentioning her jumping to conclusions because Rowan confirmed the info Kiersten receives is both random and may not just be someone's role. It's possible she received info that makes it undoubtable or at least likely enough the Anna is a wolf, or at least someone with a night role.

Here's some possibilities:
One - Kiersten received clear info, Anna is a wolf.
Two - Kiersten received vague info that implied Anna is a wolf and is taking a gambol
Three - Kiersten received vague info that Anna has a night role which means she could be
a) the fool
b) the spellcaster

And that's it. There's no other night roles that aren't wolves that would be active at this point in time since our bodyguard is dead and the mayor silversmith, and hunter don't need night PM's for their roles (unless the hunter is killed, which they haven't been yet).

The only possible roles I think Anna has is either Fool or Wolf. And I'm still willing to bet on wolf. Worst case, the village takes a hit of a quiet player who was collecting wrong info for 3 days, or we get a wolf.

EDIT: also possible Kiersten got the implication that Anna is bonded to the Dire Wolf, in which case, still good to lynch, sorry :<
 
Here's a thought, Anna. In the interests of helping the village, does anyone else think it would be too risky for Anna to reveal the info she received on the previous nights? I can say with 100% certainty she is not the seer so I'm not too worried about players being targeted.
 
The fact that shes liking Anna's posts is confusing me. Either she realized she jumped to conclusions or maybe mixed up the formatting?

Either way I'm also switching to Samuel Phillips
 
I think it might be interesting to know....but I'm a little wary it might put some players in danger.
 
Elliot Briar said:
Here's a thought, Anna. In the interests of helping the village, does anyone else think it would be too risky for Anna to reveal the info she received on the previous nights? I can say with 100% certainty she is not the seer so I'm not too worried about players being targeted.
Click to expand...
The thing is here, I have considered that myself, but I do not want to out any roles if they are useful to the village, that is assuming I am not the fool. If I am the fool the roles told to me aren't important, but if they are I want to keep them secret.
 
Would it be safe for Anna to say who they checked?

edit: but not their roles? im not sure if this would help at all though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top