War

Is The Iraq War Just?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sorta

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Franz Mc Franklen

Member
 
Messages
20
Wand
Oak Wand 13" Essence of A Dragon's Talon
Personally i think that the Iraq "War" is just.

We aren't there just to kill all the terrerists, we are there to help them set up a good government and economy plan.

We are making them our allies, so in the future they could help us.

So yes, i think the war is JUST
 
I don't know, however I saw a video about NATO ( or It could have just been USA) ... well It wasn't nice. They bombed IRAQ on a daily basis... killing and injuring thousands of innocent children. Is that good, no. Whoever says yes, would officially be sick. I personally don't agree in war.
 
The target of the attack was misplaced, the Taliban mostly being in Afghanistan and other middle eastern states - not so much in Iraq.
The UN voted against this war and the USA didn't back down. When the global community gives you a mandate like that, I'd say it's something you should follow - especially when you're a member of the organization that decided against the war.
The Iraq war, in all reality, was illegal according to the UN Charter (link).
Once Saddam was taken down and a new government set up then the United States should have left - assuming that you ignore that they should have never gone in.
I feel for the people fighting in Iraq, and I support them and their families for following the orders of their nation, but even moreso I do not support the Iraq war or the decisions of the nations that are in it.
 
People are so easily confused over this. I just got home from Afghanistan a couple months back, so i would hope my thoughts qualify. The Taliban was a hyper-conservative group of Islamic facists who came to power in Afghanistan after the Soviets fell back in the late 80's. They follow a strict interpretation of the Koran, ignoring all the parts about not spreading misery (there isnt much of it, but it IS there) and really enjoying the parts about making women second class citizens and putting clergy in charge of most major decisions. It was a borderline theocracy, in that any line a mullah dropped was almost instantaneously turned into law.

They were a state sponsor of terrorism, especially terrorism against the west (Terrorism is using fear to achieve your goal, normally a political goal, just so we are on the same page). This is for any number of ideals and ideas, i am sure everyone there has their own personal grudge and vengence they are after. They funded known terrorist cells, gave them safe haven and support. The Taliban was never in Iraq, as it would have started to undermine Saddam Hussien's power. He would have ruthlessly and efficiently stomped it out, killed it's members and imprisoned anyone he was unsure of. The taliban knew this, and NEVER made a play for Iraq. They were never there, never recruited from there in meaningful numbers, never trained there and never used it as a base for any serious operation.

For whatever reason, George W. Bush decided invading a country that had never even looked sideways at the United States since the first Gulf War was a brilliant idea, and bombed it back to the stone age. Most of the September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, a suppossed friend of the United States (they are not, but they enjoy getting billions of dollars from us). This war and the deaths it has caused can be laid at the feet of the Bush white house, and no one else.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top